Vitali G., Filippi M., Manello A., Working Paper Cnr-Ceris, N° 14/2012 theoretical and empirical literature is that the probability of engage self employment could be higher within ethnic minority than for native population. According to the so called disadvantage theory, immigrants use self-employment as an instrument to escape from labor market discriminations (Moore, 1983) that reduce the level of wage and the probability of finding a job. According to this consideration, the expected earnings from self-employment are higher than the value of wage from being employee (Blanchflower, 2004) and rational agents choose entrepreneurship to maximize their revenues. Another possible explanation relies on the opportunity that immigrant firms find informal financial resources and cheap labor force thanks to their “cultural or ethnic networks”, a useful instrument to increase social capital within a specific local area (Portes, 1998). More recently, Ibrahim and Galt, (2011) suggest an alternative explanation derived from institutional economics, underlining how the transaction costs could be lower within ethnic minority due to the transmission of non-market information that it is easier for people sharing the same culture and traditions. In this sense ethnic groups are seen as “efficient, low cost, cultural transmission units” (Landa, 1991). Given the importance of tradition and culture, the presence of different ethnic groups and their concentration across regions could change drastically local entrepreneurial rates, and this evidence comes from different previous contributions. By analyzing a sample from Sweden, Hammarstedt (2004) provides strong evidence on different self-employment rates depending on minority group origin. Clark and Drinkwater, (2010) show estimates of the change in the self-employment probability between 1991-2001 across ethnic groups in UK and find significant differences which are robust to the statistical control for individual characteristics. The specific ethnic characteristics, such as cultural heritage, traditions and beliefs, increase per se the propensity toward entrepreneurship as it was 6 documented by Light and Rosenstein, (1995). More recent approaches try to develop a more quantitative framework to analyze cultural difference among groups. The so called GLOBE project (Javidan et al., 2006) try, for example, to evaluate, using a scoring system, nine aspects of different cultures, underlining the different approach adopted by each ethnic group. This method based on scales is enlarged and enriched by Hayton, George and Zahra, (2002) adding more aspects of human behavior, while Chand and Ghorbani (2011) propose a comparison of Chinese and Indian approach to business and life using the GLOBE’s scale. Of course, economic motivation could explain different probability of engaging self-employment for some minority groups, such as the different level of economic development and trade opportunities of their own country. It is very common that an ethnic entrepreneur maintains better linkages with his original country and if this country has a dynamic economy it creates more exchange opportunities for ethnic entrepreneurship (Coughlin and Wall, 2011). Other studies concern the perceived reliability regarding the components of some minority groups. For example, Parker (2004) observes, for the UK case, significant racial differences for the access to formal financial sources, as banks are more willing to give loans to certain ethnic groups than others. The aspect of informal financial sources is also strictly linked to the presence of the so called “ethnic networks”, which makes easier the collection of financial resources. Moreover, previous studies suggest a positive effect of ethic networks on sustaining the level of export and import, confirming the usual pro-trade effect of ethnic firms (Duanmu and Guney, 2012). Parker (2004) suggests also that ethnic entrepreneurs are concentrated in some traditional industrial sectors, often characterized by lower growth, longer working time and limited earning possibilities. Province specialization in such sectors is an important factor enhancing the presence of ethnic entrepreneurs and increasing the entrepreneurial rate among foreign individuals.